RECENT COMMENTS

  • Breaking News

    Wednesday 31 August 2016

    Tips and tricks How to solve analytical reasoning problem causes and effects problem

    Dear reader 
    Here we explain with example

    Role of tense in determining cause and effect
    Rule: Causes come before effects. An event that takes place before another event can be its cause but not its effect. Often it is the tense of the two given sentences that helps us determine which of them occurred earlier. Adverbs of time also like before, next week, now, then, today, tomorrow, since, etc. also play a crucial role.
    Examples
    1.
    Event A: Today, the Foreign Ministers of countries M and N decided to take steps to improve their bilateral relations.
    Event B: Next week, the Foreign Secretaries of countries P and Q will work out further steps to improve their relationship.
    Event A is in the present tense and event B is in the future tense. So A, which comes before B, can be the cause of B, but not its effect. This is additionally clear from the adverbs of time ‘today’ and ‘next week.’ Since ‘today’ comes before ‘next week,’ A can be the cause of B but B cannot be the cause of A.
    2.
    Event A: Prices of smart phones personal have come down.
    Event B: Some children are showing keen interest in handling smart phones.
    Event A is in the present perfect and event B is in the present continuous. This means that A has already occurred and B is still occurring. So A can be the cause of B, but B cannot be the cause of A.
    3.
    Event A: The price of silver has gone up in the local market.
    Event B: India has won several prizes in design of silver ornaments.
    Both the events are in the present prefect tense. Here we cannot say which of them occurred earlier

    Rule: An event in the past tense will come before events in the present and future, and an event in the present will come before an event in the future.


    Exception to this rule
    Events in the simple present tense are often universal generalizations. Such sentences can be the cause of sentences even in the past tense, given that the reason for something that happened in the past is the fact that that thing has always happened! You can see that the clause ‘such a thing has always happened’ is in the present tense but it still the cause of something that happened in the past.


    Example
    Event A: Horses run fast (simple present tense).
    Event B: Rana Pratap’s horse outran its chasers and took his master to safety (simple past tense).
    Here B should have been the cause of A given that events in the past tense take place before events in the present tense. But as is clear from the example, events in the simple present tense can be the cause of events in the past.

    Rule: A cause and effect relationship can exist between events in any of the three tenses. There can be a cause-effect relationship between two events that are both in the past tense, or both in the present tense, or even both in the future.

    Cause and effect between two events in the future tense
    Event A: I shall be finishing my work at six in the evening tomorrow
    Event B: I shall be free at six tomorrow evening.

    Cause and effect between two events in the past
    Event A: I had finished my work at six in the evening yesterday.
    Event B: I was free at six in the evening yesterday

    Cause and effect between two events in the present tense
    Event A: I finish my work at six in the evening.
    Event B: I am free at six in the evening

    Some illustrations of the role of tense in determining cause-effect
    1.
    Event A: Authorities have ordered the removal of all diesel vehicles 10 or more years old off the capital city's streets.
    Event B: People participated eagerly in the odd-even vehicle number scheme in Delhi
    Event A is in the present perfect tense and event B in the simple past. This tells us that both the events have already taken place but that event A could still be the cause of B.
    2.
    Event A: India, which has been for hundreds of years an unskilled labour surplus market, poses a special challenge to governments and non-government organizations engaged in formulation of labour empowerment policies and execution of labour empowerment projects.
    Event B: Poverty in India is long-standing, widespread and crippling, and it has a differentiated nature across regions, social structures and economic classes.
    Both the events are in the simple present tense. So we will have to look elsewhere for clues.
    3.
    Event A: Simplification of green norms is an important aspect of the ease of doing business—one of the focus areas of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.
    Event B: The environment ministry has proposed simplifying some green norms and entirely doing away with others in a move aimed at enhancing the ease of doing business and spurring the housing-for-all program.
    Event A is in the simple present tense whereas event B is in the present perfect. This suggests that the event described in event B is already done whereas the one in event A is a general statement, i.e. not a one-time event. Thus it is clear that the generalization given in event A can be the cause of the one-time event given in event B.
    4.   
    Event A: The government of India has ordered a nationwide review of the 35000-cr program of MGNREGA to see if it meets the objective of generating jobs and creating durable assets.

    Event B: There are a large number of incomplete works and lack of awareness among many households regarding their entitlements.

    Given that statement A is in the present perfect and statement B in the simple present tense, B can be the cause of A but A cannot be the cause of B. This is because the simple present is used for making generalizations whereas the present perfect indicates a specific act that has already occurred. And a generalization should precede a specification, not follow it.

    5.

    Event A: The impact of Brexit (UK quitting the European Union) on India would be relatively subdued because of India’s lower export exposure to UK
    Event B: The major area of relationship between India and UK is trade.
    Event A is in the simple future tense whereas event B is in the simple present. This suggests that A could be the effect of B but that B could not be the effect of A.
    6.
    Event A: India has officially joined the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) as a full member, three days after its failed NSG bid due to stiff opposition from China


    Event B: China, which opposed India's entry into the Nuclear Suppliers Group at the just-concluded Seoul plenary, is not a member of 34-nation MTCR

    Event A is in the present perfect tense and event B is in the simple present. This means B, which is a more generalized statement owing to its tense, can be the cause of B, which refers to an event that has already taken place.

    7.

    Event A: The number of abusers of medicinal prescriptions like cough syrups has been growing in India at an alarming rate
    Event B: All cough syrups contain opium and are sold in India without prescription
    Event A is in the present continuous tense and event B in the simple present. As such, tense does not give us a clear indication of a causal relationship between the two events. So we will have to look for other clues.
    8.
    Event A: The window for a rate cut has been closed at least in the near future, say, the next quarter.
    Event B: Retail inflation numbers reflected in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) have moved north enough to worry the RBI.
    Event A employs the present perfect verb ‘has been closed,’ and event B too employs the present perfect ‘have moved.’ Thus tense will not reveal if there is a cause-effect relationship between the two events

    Source   http://www.oureducity.com

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Fashion

    Beauty

    Culture